When building API infrastructure, choosing between API proxy vs API gateway shapes your system's performance, security, and scalability. Both tools work as intermediaries between clients and backend services, but their capabilities differ in how they handle security, transform data, and coordinate multiple services.
This guide of 9Proxy will help you easily choose the right solution between API gateway vs API proxy. You'll know when to use each approach, understand its core differences, and learn how to avoid common mistakes.

API proxy is a lightweight middle layer between client apps and backend services. It provides a stable, controlled interface to the backend by forwarding requests, handling basic authentication, and applying minimal traffic control, usually without changing backend code.

API proxies offer straightforward advantages for simpler setups:
Below, we compare API proxy vs API gateway across ten key areas to help you pick the right solution for your needs.
API proxies work well for lightweight request forwarding with basic security, while API gateways provide the full feature set needed for complex, large-scale systems. You can choose API proxy vs API gateway depending on transformation needs, security requirements, observability goals, and budget.
API proxy becomes the right choice when you have simple needs and limited resources. Choose a proxy when you manage just a few stable APIs that don't need frequent changes or complex coordination between services. Proxies work best for teams with similar client applications that don't require complex data transformations or protocol conversions. They're also perfect for projects with tight budgets and fast deadlines because they're quick to deploy and cost much less than gateways.

Unlike proxies, API gateways work best when you need advanced features and handle complex operations. Choose a gateway when you manage many microservices that need centralized control for load balancing and service coordination, or when you serve different client types like web apps, mobile apps, and IoT devices.
Gateways are also the right choice for organizations with high security needs, such as OAuth and multi-factor authentication, or for businesses that expose public APIs to external developers and need advanced analytics. If your system expects rapid growth or heavy traffic spikes, gateways provide the autoscaling and performance optimization you need.

API proxy vs API gateway comparisons often reveal that proxies can handle some gateway jobs through custom coding and setup, but they miss the built-in abilities that make gateways powerful for complex situations. While you might add extra logic to a proxy, this method needs more development work and maintenance compared to using a purpose-built gateway.
API proxies handle basic mediation but struggle with complex transformations. When converting protocols like SOAP to REST, proxies need custom code that you must write, maintain, and update yourself. This can take weeks or months and requires revisiting the code whenever changes occur.
API gateways, on the other hand, offer built-in transformation policies that let you convert existing services into advanced APIs in minutes. You get ready-to-use templates for payload mapping, schema validation, and version negotiation without writing custom code. Gateways provide reusable policies you can apply across multiple APIs, saving development time and reducing maintenance work.

API proxy vs API gateway functionality differs most in orchestration capabilities. API proxies lack orchestration features, but gateways handle this well. Here's what gateways can do:

When examining API proxy vs API gateway integration capabilities, gateways handle complex integrations that would overwhelm basic proxies. You can use gateways to replace or complement Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) systems, especially in modern microservices architectures.
While ESBs focus on internal system integration with heavy transformation capabilities, API gateways specialize in external API management with lighter orchestration. Gateways let you connect diverse backend systems, legacy SOAP services, modern REST APIs, and new technologies like GraphQL without extensive custom coding.

Before picking between an API proxy vs API gateway, ask yourself these key questions to match your choice with actual needs rather than guesses:

When your proxy can't handle your growing system anymore, it's time to switch to a gateway. The API proxy vs API gateway migration path requires a step-by-step plan. First, set up the gateway alongside your existing proxy. Then, slowly move some traffic over to test it. Start with your simplest, least important APIs. Once everything works well, gradually move the rest. This keeps your service running without interruption.
Many teams make costly mistakes when selecting between API proxy vs API gateway. Here are the most common ones to avoid:
Using a gateway when you don't need one
Don't set up a full API gateway for simple applications with just a few services. This wastes resources and makes things too complex. Start with a basic proxy for simple needs, then upgrade later as you grow.
Staying with a proxy for too long
When your system grows to microservices, don't keep using a basic proxy. Making the wrong API proxy vs API gateway choice at this stage forces you to build custom features yourself that gateways already provide.
Skipping performance and security testing
Always configure caching, rate limiting, and authentication properly. Test everything under realistic conditions before launching to avoid slow performance and security holes.
Not monitoring after launch
Set up monitoring and logging right from the start to catch problems early. Your API gateway vs API proxy setup needs regular metric reviews, error pattern analysis, and policy adjustments based on real usage, not guesses.

Choosing between API proxy vs API gateway depends on your architecture complexity, security needs, and growth plans. Proxies work well for simple setups with few backend services and basic security. They're quick to deploy and don't add much overhead. Gateways become necessary when you have microservices, need strong security, must convert between protocols, or expect to scale up significantly.
For teams managing accounts globally, you could combine API infrastructure with tools like duoplus to simplify account management across different regions and platforms. Check out 9Proxy for more practical guides on APIs and proxies!
Get Newsletters About Everything Proxy-Related